• CLOSETED STANCE

“Acceptability in the minds of people” is another fight to win.

“Acceptability in the minds of people” is another fight to win.

One of the ancient Indian texts which speak the art of living A.K.A “Kama sutra” has a complete chapter on erotic homosexual behavior yet most of the Indian society finds it difficult to accept LGBTQ people.



In a nutshell: For a long time, there was me, and my body. ‘Me’ was composed of stories, of cravings, of strivings, of desires of the future. ‘Me’ was trying not to be an outcome of my violent past, but the separation that had already occurred between me and my body was a pretty significant outcome. ‘Me’ was trying to be something, somebody. ‘Me’ only existed in the trying. My body was often in the way.


In other words, we are always confused between the needs of our body and needs of our soul. One can satisfy both by accomplishing the greater control over our thinking capacity. The term ‘sexual intercourse’ has more become an outcome of greedy mind imagination, rather than satisfying the needs of human body and soul. Hence, the problem of doing things without understanding remains constantly alive while we end up with the obstruction in peace of mind.

Now the ultimate question remains to be asked amongst greatest of mind.


Did homosexuality exist in ancient India?



In other words, we are always confused between the needs of our body and the needs of our soul. One can satisfy both by accomplishing the greater control over our thinking capacity. The term ‘sexual intercourse’ has more become an outcome of greedy mind imagination, rather than satisfying the needs of the human body and soul. Hence, the problem of doing things without understanding remains constantly alive while we end up with the obstruction in the peace of mind.ourse of a subterfuge, or as a result of dissatisfaction or franticness? And do we incorporate contacts including those who consider themselves not one or the other male nor female (for illustration, hijras)? Definitions are critical since ‘homosexuality’ does not imply the same thing to all individuals. Other than, the meaning has changed over time. As has the meaning of heterosexuality.


Until the early 20th century, ‘heterosexuality’ was utilized to allude to ‘morbid sexual practices’ between men and ladies such as verbal and butt-centric intercut, as contradicted to ‘normal’ procreative sex. The term homosexuality – that's so casually utilized nowadays and is nearly an ordinary lexicon – came into being as it were within the late 19th century Europe when talks on the shifted expressions of sex and sexuality got to be worthy in scholastic circles. The term was utilized to portray “morbid sexual energy between individuals of the same sex.” It was pronounced ‘unnatural’ by colonial laws, as unnatural as casual sex between men and ladies that were not pointed at conception.


The term homosexuality and the laws forbidding ‘unnatural’ sex were forced over the world through royal might. In spite of the fact that they applied a capable impact on ensuing demeanors, they were not one or the other all-inclusive nor ageless. They were – it must be kept in intellect – items of minds that were profoundly affected by the ’sex is sin’ position of the Christian Book of scriptures. With normal colonial condescension, European definitions, laws, speculations, and demeanors completely ignored how comparative sexual action was seen in other societies.


There never has been over geology or history a standard expression of, or a common state of mind towards sexual acts between individuals of the same sex. Cherish of a man for a boy was organizing in old Greece, among Samurais in Japan, in certain African as well as Polynesian tribes. Among a few Local and South American tribes, suggestive connections between men were worthy as long as one of the accomplices was ‘feminine’. For Middle easterners, so medieval voyagers claim, ‘women were for domestic and hearth, whereas boys were for pleasure’. These societies offer no equivalent word for same-sex intercut. It was maybe a hone that did not justify definition, categorization or indeed condemnation. So long because it did not undermine the prevailing hetero social build.


These pictures cannot be basically rejected as debased fantasies of a craftsman or his supporter considering the significant custom significance given to these hallowed places. There have been numerous clarifications advertised for these pictures – extending from the sorry to the crazy. A few researchers hold a or maybe strict see that lovers are being admonished to take off these sexual considerations aside some time recently entering the sanctum sanctorum. Others accept that covered up in these pictures could be a sacrosanct Tantric geometry; the applicant can either be tricked by the sexuality of the pictures or edified by disentangling the geometrical designs in that. One school of thought considers these pictures to representations of either mysterious customs or ripeness ceremonies. Another proposes that these were items of worsen minds fixated with sex in a degenerate stage of Indian history. Agreeing to antiquated treatises on engineering, a devout structure is inadequate unless its dividers portray something sexual, for arousing delights.t around the same time.


The run of suggestive figures is wide: from honorable couples trading sentimental looks, to wild bashes including warriors, sages and prostitutes. Sometimes one finds pictures portraying brutishness coupled with friezes of creatures in intercut. All rules are broken: elephants are appeared having sexual with tigers, monkeys attack ladies whereas men mate with asses. And once in a whereas, covered up in specialties as in Khajuraho, one does discover pictures of either ladies sexually grasping other ladies or men showing their privates to each other, the previous being more common (recommending a tilt in support of the male voyeur).


To discover out in case homosexuality or same-sex intercut existed in India, and in what shape, we have to turn to three sources: pictures on sanctuary dividers, sacrosanct stories and old law books. What the dividers appear, the Development of Hindu sanctuaries in stone started around the 6th century of the Common Time. The development comes to climax between the twelfth and the fourteenth century when the amazing pagodas of eastern and southern India such as Puri and Tanjore came into being. On the dividers and portals of these wonderful structures, we discover an assortment of pictures: divine beings, goddesses, evil presences, fairies, sages, warriors, significant others, clerics, beasts, mythical serpents, plants, and creatures. Among scenes from sagas and legends, one perpetually finds suggestive pictures counting those that cutting edge law considers unnatural and society considers disgusting. Inquisitively sufficient, comparable pictures to adorn supplication corridors and cave sanctuaries of ascetic orders such as Buddhism and Jainism built around the same time.


These pictures cannot be basically rejected as debased fantasies of a craftsman or his supporter considering the significant custom significance given to these hallowed places. There have been numerous clarifications advertised for these pictures – extending from the sorry to the crazy. A few researchers hold a or maybe strict see that lovers are being admonished to take off these sexual considerations aside some time recently entering the sanctum sanctorum. Others accept that covered up in these pictures could be a sacrosanct Tantric geometry; the applicant can either be tricked by the sexuality of the pictures or edified by disentangling the geometrical designs in that. One school of thought considers these pictures to representations of either mysterious customs or ripeness ceremonies. Another proposes that these were items of worsen minds fixated with sex in a degenerate stage of Indian history. Agreeing to antiquated treatises on engineering, a devout structure is inadequate unless its dividers portray something sexual, for arousing delights

-Prachi Gandhi

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

  • White Facebook Icon
  • Instagram

Created with compassion by NJN